![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
litheraI've seen pictures of the new Catwoman costume for Halle Berry.
Oh dear god. What have we done to deserve this? No. Really.
*twitch*
So. Bad.
I warned you.
And on another note: Warner Bros. Pictures and Village Roadshow Pictures will unveil The Matrix Revolutions, the final explosive chapter in the blockbuster "Matrix" trilogy, at the exact same moment in time in every major city around the world on November 5. This unprecedented distribution scenario will make the highly anticipated film available to fans simultaneously at 6 a.m. in Los Angeles, 9 a.m. in New York, 2 p.m. in London, 5 p.m. in Moscow, 11 p.m. in Tokyo and at corresponding times in over 50 additional countries worldwide.
Oh dear god. What have we done to deserve this? No. Really.
*twitch*
So. Bad.
I warned you.
And on another note: Warner Bros. Pictures and Village Roadshow Pictures will unveil The Matrix Revolutions, the final explosive chapter in the blockbuster "Matrix" trilogy, at the exact same moment in time in every major city around the world on November 5. This unprecedented distribution scenario will make the highly anticipated film available to fans simultaneously at 6 a.m. in Los Angeles, 9 a.m. in New York, 2 p.m. in London, 5 p.m. in Moscow, 11 p.m. in Tokyo and at corresponding times in over 50 additional countries worldwide.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
ugh!!!
Date: 2003-09-29 03:50 pm (UTC)Re: ugh!!!
Date: 2003-09-29 03:53 pm (UTC)Sean Young wanted the role. And she could have done SUCH a good Catwoman.
This will be so bad. So, so bad.
no subject
Date: 2003-09-29 04:06 pm (UTC)Re: ugh!!!
Date: 2003-09-29 04:08 pm (UTC)Just... *twitch*
no subject
Date: 2003-09-29 04:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-09-29 04:09 pm (UTC)And I am not going to see Revolutions at 6 in the bloody morning. For that, I will wait until I can see it at a reasonable time, preferably on an IMAX screen.
no subject
Date: 2003-09-29 04:09 pm (UTC)Also, she makes me think of Eartha Kitt, one of the 2 original catwoman actresses from the really cheesy 70's show.
It could be a lot worse than what you led me to believe.
no subject
Date: 2003-09-29 04:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-09-29 04:14 pm (UTC)Catwoman, not Look-at-my-skin-woman
no subject
Date: 2003-09-29 04:18 pm (UTC)It just isn't appealing to me in anyway and I typically think Halle Berry is attractive.
I loved Eartha Kitt as Catwoman. Her and Julie Newmar were the only good parts of that show.
That plus the official synopsis make me not want to see this movie at all:
"Catwoman" is a feature film based on characters created by DC Comics. In this new adventure Patience Price, a mild mannered graphic artist, is murdered in order to keep her silent about an accidental discovery she made. An ancient myth is played out, when an Egyptian Mao cat, indebted to Patience for saving her it's own life, breathes life back into the young woman. Patience is reborn with an independent attitude, carefree behavior and the heightened senses of a cat. Now she must investigate the circumstances behind her murder and learn to accept both parts of herself.
no subject
Date: 2003-09-29 04:30 pm (UTC)Still think she's hot, still think the costume is ok.
no subject
Date: 2003-09-29 04:33 pm (UTC)I will admit that Halle Berry + Hero Movie concept makes me cringe anyway, however, since I really didn't like her as Storm. So I may be biased.
no subject
Date: 2003-09-29 04:34 pm (UTC)I kinda like the pants, but I don't think they can be made to work for the character. For going to a dance club, okay. Slap some glitter on her, lose the mask, and she'd look great.
no subject
Date: 2003-09-29 04:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-09-29 04:39 pm (UTC)*deep, cleansing breath*
Actually I kind of like it
Date: 2003-09-29 04:41 pm (UTC)...oh who am I fooling? That's pathetic.
Meow??
Date: 2003-09-29 04:43 pm (UTC)ew!
Date: 2003-09-29 05:29 pm (UTC)Just wrong in so many ways. Granted, I grew up watching Eartha Kitt and Julie Newmar...
no subject
Date: 2003-09-29 05:29 pm (UTC)Then again, I also think Basset should have been the first black woman to win Best Leading Acress in the Oscars for What's Love Got To Do With It? I still think she's a much better actress than Berry (and more attractive to boot).
no subject
Date: 2003-09-29 07:05 pm (UTC)I'm just gonna bury myself in my Ed Brubaker Catwoman comics and pretend this doesn't exist...
omg
Date: 2003-09-29 07:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-09-29 07:28 pm (UTC)1. The toes sticking out of high heels. Catwoman in high heels is tradition, if still kinda silly, so the heels are okay. But Catwoman does a lot of puissant ass-kicking with those delicate feet. DAINTY BREAKABLE TOES STICKING OUT IS NONO.
2. If she's going to wear a...god, a fucking HEADDRESS like that, she needs long hair to balance out the lines. Catwoman has always had very good, very strokable hair--she's a CAT WOMAN. So where the hell is it?
3. The pants, which make her look as though something has already kicked her ass. Nyet. Catwoman has too much pride for that. No beat-to-shit clothes for Catwoman, and especially nothing that advertises she, personally, has been beat to shit.
4. Smooth, lickable skin = good. Smooth, lickable skin exposed to rope burns and knife-fights and bruises from Batman's boots? Not so good. See #3 re: pride. See also: SHE'S A PRAGMATIC BITCH-QUEEN WHO LIKES TO LOOK SEXY AND COVER HER ASS AT THE SAME TIME.
5. That outfit looks as though it cost fifty bucks plus three-fifty for scissors. And that's a generous estimate. Given how much money she rakes in and the lifestyle she leads, Catwoman should never appear in public in an outfit that costs less than seven hundred dollars.
Rrrah. I love Cats. That's wrong. That whole getup just urinates in my pudding. It's ugly and I hate it.
no subject
Date: 2003-09-29 07:37 pm (UTC)Feel better.
Remember the almost-Catwoman of Deitrich.
That almost makes up for this atrocity.
just so you know....
Date: 2003-09-29 08:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-09-29 10:08 pm (UTC)Re: omg
Date: 2003-09-29 10:57 pm (UTC)Re: just so you know....
Date: 2003-09-29 11:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-09-29 11:07 pm (UTC)I'm just going to pretend that this is some OTHER Catwoman. this is not Selena.
no subject
Date: 2003-09-29 11:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-10-02 05:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-10-02 05:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-10-02 05:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-10-02 05:34 pm (UTC)