I'd seen it once, and it held the game up, and the announcers made a big deal about how rare this was and how at least one player was guaranteed a penalty from this call. And on and on and on.
If the stick is illegal, Avalanche get a 5-3 power play. That frees them up to skate (their biggest strength - the Avs are much better skaters than the Red Wings). if it doesn't work out, it goes to 4-4, which frees up room on the ice, which means more skating.
I don't know if I'd say the Avs are much better skatters, I think the Wings are faster on the ice, but I will give it up to the mad skillz of the Avs, but it's not like they skate circles around The Wings...
no subject
Date: 2002-05-29 09:14 pm (UTC)Normally, the stick is legal, and the player who called for it to be checked gets a penalty for delay of game.
Re:
Date: 2002-05-29 09:43 pm (UTC)Re:
Date: 2002-05-29 09:52 pm (UTC)I'd seen it once, and it held the game up, and the announcers made a big deal about how rare this was and how at least one player was guaranteed a penalty from this call. And on and on and on.
no subject
Date: 2002-05-29 10:09 pm (UTC)Re:
Date: 2002-05-29 10:13 pm (UTC)Re:
Date: 2002-05-29 10:13 pm (UTC)Re:
Date: 2002-05-29 10:23 pm (UTC)It was a few years ago ... but I was in Everett by then, which means it was between three and four years ago.
no subject
Date: 2002-05-29 10:49 pm (UTC)If the stick is illegal, Avalanche get a 5-3 power play. That frees them up to skate (their biggest strength - the Avs are much better skaters than the Red Wings). if it doesn't work out, it goes to 4-4, which frees up room on the ice, which means more skating.
Either way, the advantage was to the Avs.
Of course, it really didn't make a difference...
JD
Re:
Date: 2002-05-29 10:55 pm (UTC)Re:
Date: 2002-05-30 12:38 pm (UTC)Re:
Date: 2002-05-30 12:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-05-30 06:33 pm (UTC)From the Man in Bellingham,
Michael