Yes, yes, I know...
Apr. 18th, 2002 08:54 amWe lost. This does not bother me for a few reasons. I'm a loyal fan. I was with the Red Wings when they were called, very unaffectionately, the Dead Things. When they couldn't make th playoffs (and only five teams didn't make it). That and typically they lose the first game of a series. It's nice when they don't but it isn't a soul crushingly bad thing either. That and from what I could tell both teams were not playing the hockey I know they can. It really felt like a warm up game. Tonight, I wish to see the Kings beat the Avs. That would be nice.
So, I'm still packing. The thing is, the more I pack, the more my apartment looks like a disaster zone. I don't understand it at all. I put all the clothes I don't want in a bag. So I have books, videos and clothes all ready to go somewhere and be donated or something. The plan for this evening is to finish my books, pack all of my CDs and movies and start on the dishes and glasses I'm not using.
I hate packing.
So, I'm still packing. The thing is, the more I pack, the more my apartment looks like a disaster zone. I don't understand it at all. I put all the clothes I don't want in a bag. So I have books, videos and clothes all ready to go somewhere and be donated or something. The plan for this evening is to finish my books, pack all of my CDs and movies and start on the dishes and glasses I'm not using.
I hate packing.
no subject
Date: 2002-04-18 09:31 am (UTC)Re:
Date: 2002-04-18 10:03 am (UTC)Re:
Date: 2002-04-18 10:22 am (UTC)Re:
Date: 2002-04-18 10:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-04-18 10:19 am (UTC)Re:
Date: 2002-04-18 10:22 am (UTC)*hugs*
Re:
Date: 2002-04-18 10:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-04-18 10:47 am (UTC)The Kings are going to have some trouble beating the Avs - I'd say it'll be determined by Forsberg. If Forsberg is even playing at 85%, the Kings won't be able to win - with a healthy Forsberg the Avalanche can play three strong scoring lines. The Kings simply can't match that depth. Without Forsberg, the Kings can concentrate on beating up on Joe Sakic and that turns the series into an entirely different contest.
JD
Re:
Date: 2002-04-18 10:56 am (UTC)I'm waiting to see how Forsberg really is. No matter what, he won't be 100%. With out Hejduk, all they'd really need to do is cause Roy to lose his cool, which I've seen them do. Potvin is a competant goalie and he should be okay.
no subject
Date: 2002-04-18 11:01 am (UTC)If Forsberg is back and at 85%, the Kings just don't have the defensive depth to cover both Forsberg and Sakic. That opens both men up for scoring opportunities. Potvin is good, but he's not a top tier goaltender (he's not on the level of Roy, Hasek, Belfour, and Brodeur).
JD
no subject
Date: 2002-04-18 03:37 pm (UTC)And "peak" means more than just physical ability; it's the psychological urgency that pushes athletes to do better and really win games. That's a draining factor, and it can't be repeated at will.
So perhaps the Wings were coasting through April, resting up physcially and mentally for the much tougher task ahead.
Kat, do you have an octopus ready?
Re:
Date: 2002-04-18 03:59 pm (UTC)Yeah. Well, they were resting most of their players through out this month, which is something. One game is not that big of a deal. Two... Two would be near deadly.
no subject
Date: 2002-04-18 04:09 pm (UTC)A frozen one would be much better.
Re:
Date: 2002-04-18 04:10 pm (UTC)