I have to give them credit for differentiating the products just enough to make me want two.
After all, touch screen and wi-fi versus all that lovely lebensraum... how does one decide?
If they had the new nano's when I was trying to pick between the video iPod and the old school nano a couple years back, I think I would've gone wtih the video nano and learned to be a lot more discriminatory with my playlists.
That much is debatable (well, up to 32 gigs) but y'know, I would've been happy with a hard drive based iTouch. I know it would've been bigger, but I really can handle more than 8 mm in thickness.
It's soooo pretty, though. I think it's a great way to capture much of the audience who wanted an iPhone but wasn't willing to switch carriers for it.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-05 06:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-05 06:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-05 06:12 pm (UTC)After all, touch screen and wi-fi versus all that lovely lebensraum... how does one decide?
If they had the new nano's when I was trying to pick between the video iPod and the old school nano a couple years back, I think I would've gone wtih the video nano and learned to be a lot more discriminatory with my playlists.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-05 06:14 pm (UTC)I need a new one. My shuffle is really getting old.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-05 06:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-05 06:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-05 07:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-05 07:59 pm (UTC)It's soooo pretty, though. I think it's a great way to capture much of the audience who wanted an iPhone but wasn't willing to switch carriers for it.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-05 08:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-05 10:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-05 10:24 pm (UTC)