(no subject)
Jan. 9th, 2003 08:49 amHmmmmm. There will be a Lilo and Stitch sequel. I wonder if they're going to do it like every other sequel Disney does - straight to video and not nearly so cool as the first.
There are rumors, again, of a Hitchhiker's Guide movie. I have no idea if it will get anywhere, though.
You ready for Spy Kids 3? Well, they're casting for it.
And as I had assumed if Leo is playing Alexander, Nicole Kidman must be playing his mother. Of course, there doesn't seem to be anything signed for either fo them just yet.
Okay. Ummmm. The guy who writes SpongeBob SquarePants is writing the WonderTwins movie. I just... This... I hurt.
The rest of X-men Evolution is begin put on hiatus until May. Appropriate and all, but I was really, really getting into it.
There are rumors, again, of a Hitchhiker's Guide movie. I have no idea if it will get anywhere, though.
You ready for Spy Kids 3? Well, they're casting for it.
And as I had assumed if Leo is playing Alexander, Nicole Kidman must be playing his mother. Of course, there doesn't seem to be anything signed for either fo them just yet.
Okay. Ummmm. The guy who writes SpongeBob SquarePants is writing the WonderTwins movie. I just... This... I hurt.
The rest of X-men Evolution is begin put on hiatus until May. Appropriate and all, but I was really, really getting into it.
no subject
Date: 2003-01-09 09:01 am (UTC)There was an easter egg on the DVD to see the trailer for the upcoming sequel.
But you are right, most disney sequels are ass.
Maybe I should go see that trailer again. I can't remeber if it was assy or not.
no subject
Date: 2003-01-09 09:06 am (UTC)And the people who get left working on the sequel are all pissed off and bitter because they want to work on the new thing. But the reason they are stuck working on the sequel is because they weren't the best on the original.
Anyway that's how a friend described to me why sequels of video games are usually suck. Obviously there's exceptions.
no subject
Date: 2003-01-09 09:25 am (UTC)Re:
Date: 2003-01-09 09:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-01-09 09:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-01-09 10:21 am (UTC)Re:
Date: 2003-01-09 10:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-01-09 10:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-01-09 11:26 am (UTC)