More food for thought..
Jan. 26th, 2009 10:42 amAn article about female desire. Very interesting.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/25/magazine/25desire-t.html?_r=1
I'm still turning some of this over in my head but a lot of it makes sense and fits in with how I think and see things.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/25/magazine/25desire-t.html?_r=1
I'm still turning some of this over in my head but a lot of it makes sense and fits in with how I think and see things.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-26 07:44 pm (UTC)http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/01/26/sometimes-just-reading-the-headline-is-enough-to-know-an-article-will-make-you-feel-stabby/
no subject
Date: 2009-01-26 07:50 pm (UTC)If that makes sense.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-26 08:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-26 08:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-26 08:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-26 08:24 pm (UTC)I'm sure there is a better way to say that.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-26 08:29 pm (UTC)As I've gotten older, there has been significantly less pressure to "do anything" about desire I may feel toward others. There are female friends of mine who I have incredible lust for, but know nothing will ever happen, and I've learned to just enjoy the desire, flirt a bit, and not stress it. Still, it was hard to get to that point in some cases. The biological urge to mate can be strong :)
no subject
Date: 2009-01-26 08:31 pm (UTC)And it definitely doesn't make you a bad woman that you don't see things from her perspective. It's just one way out of a zillion ways that study/article can be interpreted. Heck, it's one way out of a zillion feminist ways it can be looked at, since there are so many different flavors of feminism.
I just thought it was neat that one of my tabs had you mentioning the article, and one had an article written about the article, so I cross pollenated. :) I'm sorry if I made you feel uncomfortable. I just meant to share that other people are noodling on the same thing.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-26 08:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-26 08:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-26 08:34 pm (UTC)I'm never going to turn down conversation, especially about things that provoke that sort of response from me. I want to pick it apart and understand it.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-26 08:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-26 08:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-26 09:27 pm (UTC)I think they should look at female engorgement if the info their after is pleasurable associations. They are right that lubrication could be a protective mechanism as much as arousal. Technically difficult yes, but more accurate if it's possible.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-26 09:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-26 11:42 pm (UTC)...or am I missing a joke.
again.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-26 11:44 pm (UTC)I find myself more & more enjoying the flirty fun without the compelling need to act on it.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-27 12:44 am (UTC)* wandelrust: Please eviscerate my comment if I've misinterpreted yours.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-27 02:35 pm (UTC)