Let me get this straight...
Sep. 24th, 2008 02:22 pmSo, McCain suspended his campaign today to go back to Washington to try to fix the economic situation. (Crisis? Is it a Crisis? Can I get someone to punch time? That would be totally sweet. Or maybe they could punch money... Ooooh. Okay, okay, I'm a geek. I'll stop now.)
He's calling on Obama to do the same.
While I can understand the appeal here, I'm a bit confused by it. When you're President you don't get to stop being President to go and deal with other things. You're going to have to multitask meeting with foreign dignitaries, economic problems, top line decisions about Iraq and Afghanistan... You don't get to call a time out to do something else.
I can see where McCain wants to fix the problem. That's noble. I want someone to fix the problem too. I think the current solution is an awful, awful solution and a stop gap measure at best. We need better. I understand that the dropping everything to fix this response is appealing to people who are frightened and want a solution now.
The idea that we might have a President who can't juggle all of those responsibilities at once, however, is what truly frightens me.
Am I missing something here?
He's calling on Obama to do the same.
While I can understand the appeal here, I'm a bit confused by it. When you're President you don't get to stop being President to go and deal with other things. You're going to have to multitask meeting with foreign dignitaries, economic problems, top line decisions about Iraq and Afghanistan... You don't get to call a time out to do something else.
I can see where McCain wants to fix the problem. That's noble. I want someone to fix the problem too. I think the current solution is an awful, awful solution and a stop gap measure at best. We need better. I understand that the dropping everything to fix this response is appealing to people who are frightened and want a solution now.
The idea that we might have a President who can't juggle all of those responsibilities at once, however, is what truly frightens me.
Am I missing something here?
no subject
Date: 2008-09-24 09:33 pm (UTC)The part where all politics is theatrics?
no subject
Date: 2008-09-24 09:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-24 09:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-24 09:40 pm (UTC)Okay.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-24 09:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-24 09:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-24 10:10 pm (UTC)So, is he scared of the open questions?
no subject
Date: 2008-09-24 10:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-24 10:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-24 10:17 pm (UTC)I think it's right to not have Obama & McCain (who have duties other than trying to win the hearts and minds of voters) try to juggle real work and their dog & pony show in Mississippi right now.
I think that instead of postponement to "some future date", that the debate should be merely moved to DC (or nearby) and that they should push it to a Sat or Sun where Congress doesn't do dick anyway.
I agree with the call of "let's be responsible to our real jobs first"
I don't agree that it needs to be postponed so much as to be effectively cancelled - move it a day or two and change locales.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-24 10:21 pm (UTC)Cancelling - bad. Postponement - Also bad unless it is a very, very short one.
Ultimately, I feel that not handling either of these shows a lack of responsibility and management skills.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-24 10:49 pm (UTC)http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7634455.stm
no subject
Date: 2008-09-24 10:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-24 11:24 pm (UTC)But again, neither candidate was back in DC dealing with this. I think they should be doing their jobs.
And then have the damned debate anyways.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-24 11:29 pm (UTC)Oi.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-24 11:33 pm (UTC)I think they should, with the rest of Congress, be in the Capitol working on the bailout plan. But like I said...I also think they should suck it up and do the debates around working in DC. They're both Senators...HAVE the debate in DC. :P
What, does McCain fear not having two more days of prep? It's dumb.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-24 11:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-24 11:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-25 12:00 am (UTC)Obama: ‘It is going to be part of the president’s job to deal with more than one thing at once.’
no subject
Date: 2008-09-25 12:25 am (UTC)He's trying to find a convenient way to change the topic at hand (the debate) to something else. If Obama goes, McCain has the advantage of momentum, if Obama doesn't, McCain can try to smear him about being unconcerned with the suffering of those affected by the crisis. (Read: "middle america and republicans who are on the fence")
no subject
Date: 2008-09-25 12:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-25 12:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-25 12:29 am (UTC)Hold the debate in DC.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-25 12:38 am (UTC)Firstly, neither he nor McCain sit on the committee that'll largely be overseeing the fine tuning of the bailout.
Secondly, even if they suspend their campaigns, they're still presidential nominees. Everything they say or do is pounced on by the media, as well as members of other parties. No matter how they intend it, they will bring the campaign circus with them right into the middle of this, and that alone will detract and distract from everything. Not to mention their motives will always be questioned; is it for the good of the nation, or for a photo op?
Thirdly, the President will have a dozen crises to deal with on any given day. You can't just drop everything during an emergency.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-25 12:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-25 12:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-25 01:01 am (UTC)President Bush requested his presence.
He's not suspending his campaign or agreeing to postpone the debates, though.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-25 01:15 am (UTC)Maybe it's the way Palin isn't allowed to talk to the press, like she just married Tom Cruise or something, but my first reaction to hearing McCain's statement was to think that he doesn't want to do the debate because he knows Obama is going to gain points from it, so he is just coming up with an excuse to put it off. Who knows, if he plays his cards right, he just may get elected without ever having to debate at all.
This way, he can pull a bullcrap move and pretend to be all noble and caring. I just don't buy it.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-25 03:59 am (UTC)Buffet..
Date: 2008-09-25 05:01 am (UTC)Meeting at the big house will do NOTHING for the economy.
Buffet purchased 11% of Goldman Sachs. The Market (Warren Buffet) SET A PRICE for the SHIT THAT NO ONE WANTED TO BUY and thus BOOTSTRAPPED the economic engine by settting a VALUE on shit no one wanted. We now have a line in the sand that the systems of arbitrage will restart themselves.
Give $700B to ONE MAN (Paulson) to fix what he was apart of breaking? FUCKNO.
LET IT BREAK.
Take it slow, put out the necessary fires, and let the market eat itself.
and eventually I'll figure out how to not use all caps.
E. /rant